Attitudes and Social Influence in Sustainable Fashion: Rethinking the Role of Corporate Initiatives among College Students in Taiwan

Authors

  • Sulistyandari* Faculty of Economic and Business, Universitas Jendral Soedirman, Indonesia; Department of Finance, College of Management, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Taiwan
  • Yudhistira Pradhipta Aryoko Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Muhammadiyah Purwokerto, Indonesia; Department of Business Administration, College of Management, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Taiwan
  • Sabarmuddin Tampubolon Department of Business Administration, College of Management, National Yunlin University of Science and Technology, Taiwan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55047/transekonomika.v5i5.1058

Keywords:

Attitudes Toward Sustainability, Corporate Social Responsibility, Social Norms, Sustainable Fashion Consumption

Abstract

The growing demand for sustainability in the fashion industry has encouraged corporations to invest significantly in Corporate Social Responsibility initiatives. Yet, it remains unclear whether these efforts truly influence consumer behavior. This study explores how corporate, psychological, and social factors shape sustainable fashion consumption among college students in Taiwan. Grounded in the Theory of Planned Behavior, the Value-Belief-Norm Theory, and Social Influence Theory, the research examines five key predictors: Attitudes Toward Sustainability, Social Norms, Environmental Knowledge, Perceived Economic Constraints, and Corporate Social Responsibility initiatives. Empirical data were gathered from 250 university students and subjected to examination utilizing Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Research indicates that an individual’s personal beliefs and cultural expectations significantly influence their likelihood of purchasing environmentally-conscious clothing. In contrast, environmental knowledge, economic constraints, and Corporate Social Responsibility initiatives have no significant impact. Individual beliefs and societal norms appear to have a more significant influence on environmentally conscious purchasing decisions than data-driven or financial considerations.   The minimal impact of corporate ethical programs reveals that simply implementing sustainability strategies from the top down is unlikely to transform consumer choices without genuine community involvement and widespread social approval. Overall, this study contributes to the literature on sustainability and consumer behavior by emphasizing a consumer-centered approach. It highlights that moral conviction and peer influence are more effective in promoting sustainable fashion consumption than corporate messaging. Practical insights are also provided for marketers and policymakers to encourage genuine behavioral transformation toward sustainability in the fashion sector.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahn, I., Kim, S., & Kim, M. (2020). The Relative Importance of Values, Social Norms, and Enjoyment-Based Motivation in Explaining Pro-Environmental Product Purchasing Behavior in Apparel Domain. Sustainability, 12(17), 6797. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176797

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Aryoko, Y. P., Sulistyandari, & Muazinah, C. (2025). Eco-Driven Innovation Among Gen Z Entrepreneurs: The Role of Self-Efficacy, Social Media, and Sustainability Intentions. The International Conference on Sustainable Economics Management and Accounting (ICSEMA). https://doi.org/10.32424/icsema.1.1.90

Bianchi, C., Hofer, K. M., & Saleh, M. A. (2024). Purchase intention of brands with corporate social responsibility among generations Y and Z consumers in Chile. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(6), 6246–6259. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2921

Brandão, A., & Costa, A. G. da. (2021). Extending the theory of planned behaviour to understand the effects of barriers towards sustainable fashion consumption. European Business Review, 33(5), 742–774. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2020-0306

Busalim, A., Fox, G., & Lynn, T. (2022). Consumer behavior in sustainable fashion: A systematic literature review and future research agenda. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(5), 1804–1828. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12794

Carfora, V., Buscicchio, G., & Catellani, P. (2021). Integrating Personal and Pro-Environmental Motives to Explain Italian Women’s Purchase of Sustainable Clothing. Sustainability, 13(19), 10841. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131910841

Chan, T. J., Mohd Suki, N., Ho, P. S. Y., & Akhtar, M. F. (2024). Impact of corporate social responsibility practices on consumer purchase intention of apparel products with mediating role of consumer-retailer love. Social Responsibility Journal, 20(5), 998–1014. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2023-0491

Chi, T., Adesanya, O., Liu, H., Anderson, R., & Zhao, Z. (2023). Renting than Buying Apparel: U.S. Consumer Collaborative Consumption for Sustainability. Sustainability, 15(6), 4926. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15064926

Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015–1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015

Cuesta‐Valiño, P., Gutiérrez‐Rodríguez, P., García‐Henche, B., & Núñez‐Barriopedro, E. (2024). The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer brand engagement and purchase intention at fashion retailers. Psychology & Marketing, 41(3), 649–664. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21940

Daukantienė, V. (2023). Analysis of the sustainability aspects of fashion: A literature review. Textile Research Journal, 93(3–4), 991–1002. https://doi.org/10.1177/00405175221124971

de Aguiar Hugo, A., de Nadae, J., & da Silva Lima, R. (2021). Can Fashion Be Circular? A Literature Review on Circular Economy Barriers, Drivers, and Practices in the Fashion Industry’s Productive Chain. Sustainability, 13(21), 12246. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132112246

Gomes, G. M., Moreira, N., Bouman, T., Ometto, A. R., & van der Werff, E. (2022). Towards Circular Economy for More Sustainable Apparel Consumption: Testing the Value-Belief-Norm Theory in Brazil and in The Netherlands. Sustainability, 14(2), 618. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020618

Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 30(1), 165–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030- 80519-7

Hassan, S. H., Yeap, J. A. L., & Al-Kumaim, N. H. (2022). Sustainable Fashion Consumption: Advocating Philanthropic and Economic Motives in Clothing Disposal Behaviour. Sustainability, 14(3), 1875. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031875

Indrajaya, N., Perizade, B., Wahab, Z., & Shihab, M. S. (2024). Mediating role of attitude in green purchase intention for solar power plants: A green marketing analysis. Annals of Management and Organization Research, 5(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.35912/amor.v5i2.1870

Kang, J., & Hustvedt, G. (2014). Building Trust Between Consumers and Corporations: The Role of Consumer Perceptions of Transparency and Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(2), 253–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1916-7

Kaur, J., Gupta, S., & Singh, L. B. (2023). Role of justification of unethical behaviour in sustainable fashion consumption among Indian consumers: a parallel mediation approach. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 40(7), 842–853. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-12-2020-4305

Kautish, P., Khare, A., & Sharma, R. (2020). Values, sustainability consciousness and intentions for SDG endorsement. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 38(7), 921–939. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-09-2019-0490

Kim, N., & Lee, K. (2023). Environmental Consciousness, Purchase Intention, and Actual Purchase Behavior of Eco-Friendly Products: The Moderating Impact of Situational Context. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(7), 5312. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20075312

Koro, E., & Jusufi, S. (2023). The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility in Consumer Trust and Perception of Company Image. Prizren Social Science Journal, 7(1), 24–32. https://doi.org/10.32936/pssj.v7i1.407

Lin, P.-H., & Chen, W.-H. (2022). Factors That Influence Consumers’ Sustainable Apparel Purchase Intention: The Moderating Effect of Generational Cohorts. Sustainability, 14(14), 8950. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148950

Liu, C., Bernardoni, J. M., & Wang, Z. (2023). Examining Generation Z Consumer Online Fashion Resale Participation and Continuance Intention through the Lens of Consumer Perceived Value. Sustainability, 15(10), 8213. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15108213

Liu, L., Zhang, W., Li, H., & Zheng, Z. (2024). The impact of environmental accidents on the green apparel purchase behavior of Generation Z. Frontiers in Psychology, 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1338702

Louis, D., & Lombart, C. (2024). Impact of a corporate social responsibility message on consumers’ sustainable behaviours and purchase intentions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(1), 579–599. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2587

Miotto, G., & Youn, S. (2020). The impact of fast fashion retailers’ sustainable collections on corporate legitimacy: Examining the mediating role of altruistic attributions. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 19(6), 618–631. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1852

Munawaroh, N. A., Sudarmiatin, S., & Putimelinda, W. (2024). Unveiling the Link: Does Digital Marketing Adoption Fuel Sustainable Growth for SMEs in Indonesia? Transekonomika: Akuntansi, Bisnis Dan Keuangan, 4(2), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.55047/transekonomika.v4i2.642

Nicolau, L. G. F., Christino, J. M. M., Cardozo, É. A. A., & Ferreira, F. L. (2025). The role of Eco-shame in shaping Behavioural Purchase Intentions toward sustainable fashion consumption. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 29(1), 38–57. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-01-2023-0005

Park, H. J., & Lin, L. M. (2020). Exploring attitude–behavior gap in sustainable consumption: comparison of recycled and upcycled fashion products. Journal of Business Research, 117, 623–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.08.025

Rahman, M., Rodríguez-Serrano, M. Á., & Faroque, A. R. (2021). Corporate environmentalism and brand value: A natural resource-based perspective. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 29(4), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2021.1872387

Rana, K., & Banerjee, S. P. (2024). Evaluating Consumer Behavior and Sustainable Apparel Consumption: A Study on Awareness and Influencing Factors. International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM), 8(8). https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM36938

Ray, S., & Nayak, L. (2023). Marketing Sustainable Fashion: Trends and Future Directions. Sustainability, 15(7), 6202. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15076202

Şener, T., Bişkin, F., & Dündar, N. (2023). The effects of perceived value, environmental concern and attitude on recycled fashion consumption. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 27(4), 595–611. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-01-2021-0003

Shaver, K. G. (2016). An introduction to attribution processes. Routledge.

Stern, P. C. (2000). New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175

Tandon, A., Sithipolvanichgul, J., Asmi, F., Anwar, M. A., & Dhir, A. (2023). Drivers of green apparel consumption: Digging a little deeper into green apparel buying intentions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(6), 3997–4012. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3350

Taylor, M., White, K. M., Caughey, L., Nutter, A., & Primus, A. (2023). Unique and Cheap or Damaged and Dirty? Young Women’s Attitudes and Image Perceptions about Purchasing Secondhand Clothing. Sustainability, 15(23), 16470. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152316470

Testa, F., Iraldo, F., Vaccari, A., & Ferrari, E. (2015). Why Eco‐labels can be Effective Marketing Tools: Evidence from a Study on Italian Consumers. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(4), 252–265. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1821

Vlastelica, T., Kostić-Stanković, M., Krstić, J., & Rajić, T. (2023). Generation Z’s Intentions Towards Sustainable Clothing Disposal: Extending the Theory of Planned Behavior. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies, 32(3), 2345–2360. https://doi.org/10.15244/pjoes/157007

Wang, H., Liu, H., Kim, S. J., & Kim, K. H. (2019). Sustainable fashion index model and its implication. Journal of Business Research, 99, 430–437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.027

Waris, I., Suki, N. M., Ahmed, A., & Barkat, W. (2024). Environmental corporate social responsibility initiatives and green customer citizenship behavior in tourism industry. Social Responsibility Journal, 20(6), 1138–1156. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-07-2023-0378

Wei, X., & Jung, S. (2022). Benefit appeals and perceived corporate hypocrisy: implications for the CSR performance of fast fashion brands. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 31(2), 206–217. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-04-2020-2850

Wilts, H., Fecke, M., & Zeher, C. (2021). Economics of Waste Prevention: Second-Hand Products in Germany. Economies, 9(2), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies9020074

Yuan, R., Jin, S., & Lin, W. (2025). Could trust narrow the intention‐behavior gap in eco‐friendly food consumption? Evidence from China. Agribusiness, 41(1), 260–288. https://doi.org/10.1002/agr.21886

Zhang, X., & Dong, F. (2020). Why Do Consumers Make Green Purchase Decisions? Insights from a Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(18), 6607. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186607

Downloads

Published

2025-12-02

How to Cite

Sulistyandari, S., Aryoko, Y. P., & Tampubolon, S. (2025). Attitudes and Social Influence in Sustainable Fashion: Rethinking the Role of Corporate Initiatives among College Students in Taiwan. TRANSEKONOMIKA: AKUNTANSI, BISNIS DAN KEUANGAN, 5(5), 1120-1135. https://doi.org/10.55047/transekonomika.v5i5.1058