HR Digital Transformation, Digital Work Culture, and Local Values: Evidence from Gorontalo University

Authors

  • Silveny Ismail* Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia
  • Mahludin Baruwadi Universitas Negeri Gorontalo, Indonesia
  • Mohamad Rolli Paramata Universitas Gorontalo, Indonesia
  • Deby Rita Karundeng Universitas Gorontalo, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55047/jekombital.v4i2.1064

Keywords:

Digital Transformation, Digital Work Culture, Human Resource Management, Local Values, University Performance

Abstract

Digital transformation in human resource management is increasingly essential for regional universities seeking to improve competitiveness and efficiency. This study examines how HR digital transformation affects employee performance, focusing on the mediating role of digital work culture rooted in local values. Using a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design, data were collected from 136 lecturers and administrative staff at Gorontalo University, Indonesia. The quantitative phase employed Structural Equation Modeling-Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS), followed by thematic analysis of interviews with 10 key informants. The results indicate that HR digital transformation significantly affects employee performance, both directly (β = 0.61; p < 0.001) and indirectly through digital work culture as a partial mediating variable (β_indirect = 0.17; p < 0.01). Digital transformation also has a positive effect on digital work culture (β = 0.58; p < 0.001), and digital work culture positively influences employee performance (β = 0.29; p < 0.01). The coefficient of determination (R² = 0.73) shows that the model explains 73% of the variance in employee performance, with an adequate Goodness of Fit level (SRMR = 0.065). The qualitative findings reinforce the quantitative results by revealing the emergence of “digital kinship,” a form of collaborative digital solidarity rooted in the local value of mosidara (mutual respect and cooperation). This study offers new insights by integrating the Resource-Based View and Dynamic Capability Theory, showing that successful digital transformation relies not only on technology adoption but also on cultivating a digital work culture grounded in local wisdom and digital work ethics.

References

Aisha, N., Mahilan, A., & Saefullah, A. (2025). Transformasi Budaya Organisasi dan Dampaknya terhadap Kinerja Bisnis : Strategi Adaptasi di Era Ekonomi Digital. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business (RIGGS), 4(3), 6196–6204. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i3.2911

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Brislin, R. W. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. J. Lonner & J. W. Berry Field methods in cross-cultural research (Eds). SAGE.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Dipoatmodjo, T. S. P. (2025). Transformasi Kompetensi SDM UMKM dalam Era Ekonomi Digital: Studi Naratif pada Pengusaha Kuliner Lokal Makassar. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Kewirausahaan, 2(4), 207–212. https://doi.org/10.59971/jumawa.v2i4.369

Faidz, N. (2024). Pengembangan SDM di Era Digital: Transformasi dan Adaptasi Kompetensi. Jurnal Media Akademik, 2(11), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.62281/v2i11.904

Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving Integration in Mixed Methods Designs—Principles and Practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 part 2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117

Habibani, R. A., & Frinaldi, A. (2025). Inovasi Budaya Organisasi Publik dalam Era Digital: Peluang dan Strategi Implementasi. Social: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPS, 5(2), 407–421. https://doi.org/10.51878/social.v5i2.5365

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed). SAGE.

Hidayat, D., & Yusuf, M. (2021). Digital work culture in Indonesian universities: Challenges and strategies. Indonesian Journal of Educational Administration, 15(3), 45–60.

Ibrahim, Masud, & Aduah, Elizabeth Wetania. (2025). Digital literacy, digital intelligence and small and medium enterprises’ (SMEs) sustainability: The mediating role of digital technology usage. Information Development, 02666669251335001. https://doi.org/10.1177/02666669251335001

Kane, G. C., Nanda, R., Phillips, A. N., & Copulsky, J. R. (2021). The Transformation Myth. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13965.001.0001

Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., de Vet, H. C. W., & van der Beek, A. J. (2014). Measuring individual work performance: Identifying and selecting indicators. Work, 48(2), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-131659

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Mandulangi, J., Watung, S. R., Wenas, A. R., & Rambing, P. R. (2025). Penguatan SDM sebagai Kunci Kinerja Unggul di Era Transformasi Teknologi dan Digital. Manajemen: Administrasi Bisnis Dan Pemasaran, 7(1), 102–114.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook.

OECD. (2021). OECD Digital Education Outlook 2021: Pushing the Frontiers with Artificial Intelligence, Blockchain and Robots. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/589b283f-en

Panjaitan, K., Sihombing, E., Pasaribu, C. C., & Siregar, C. A. E. (2022). Students’ Difficulties in Speaking Comprehension of Vocational High School Students. ROMEO: Review of Multidisciplinary Education, Culture And Pedagogy, 1(2), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.55047/romeo.v1i2.94

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control It. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452

Shahzad, K., Rehman, M., & Ali, A. (2022). Digital culture and organizational performance: The mediating role of innovation capability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 176, e121462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121462

Tarigan, Z. J. H., Siagian, H., & Siahaan, E. (2022). Building digital transformation strategy in higher education. Journal of Applied Management, 20(4), 601–613. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jam.2022.020.04.06

Teece, D. J. (2020). Global collaboration in knowledge intensive firms: The role of activity configurations. Journal of Management & Organization, 26(4), 519–535. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2017.75

UNESCO. (2023). Digital transformation in higher education: Challenges and opportunities. UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000384729

Wang Z, N, A., & H, H. (2022). Digital HR capabilities and organizational performance: The mediating role of digital work culture. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.09.035

World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki. JAMA, 310(20), 2191. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053

Wulandari, A. R., Arvi, A. A., Iqbal, M. I., Tyas, F., Kurniawan, I., & Anshori, M. I. (2023). Digital Hr : Digital Transformation In Increasing Productivity In The Work Environment. Jurnal Publikasi Ilmu Manajemen, 2(4), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.55606/jupiman.v2i4.2729

Downloads

Published

2025-12-09

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

HR Digital Transformation, Digital Work Culture, and Local Values: Evidence from Gorontalo University. (2025). JURNAL EKONOMI KREATIF DAN MANAJEMEN BISNIS DIGITAL, 4(2), 424-436. https://doi.org/10.55047/jekombital.v4i2.1064