PEER TO PEER LENDING : GENERATION Z ATTRACTION FACTORS AND FUTURE IMPLICATIONS

  • Felisia Panjaitan* Accounting Department, Duta Wacana Christian University
  • Servatia Mayang Setyowati Accounting Department, Duta Wacana Christian University
  • Yoshia Christian Mahulete Afiliasi Center for Fintech and Banking, Universitas Sebelas Maret
Keywords: Behavioral Intention, Financial Technology, Generation Z, Peer To Peer Lending

Abstract

This study is about the factors of behavioral intention to borrow from the perspective of Generation Z toward peer-to-peer lending. This study applied primary data by collecting surveys distributed to Gen Z on Java Island. The sample used was 44 male respondents and 110 female respondents. Factors that influence borrowing intention were tested with SEM PLS 4.0. The research shows that the variables of utilitarian value, risk perception, and financial literacy are significant to the behavioral intention of Peer To Peer Lending. In addition, the findings show that the variables of convenience and safety do not determine behavioral intention in Peer To Peer Lending. This research also explores how financial technology, such as peer-to-peer lending, can facilitate Generation Z's access to finance. The implications of this research highlight the importance of financial knowledge and planning for Gen Z for its future. These findings provide insights for fintech companies to design products and services that suit Generation Z's specific preferences and needs. The target market for peer-to-peer lending companies needs to be adjusted in their marketing strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alexander, K., & Karametaxas, X. (2021). Digital transformation and financial inclusion. Routledge Handbook of Financial Technology and Law, 273–290. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429325670-15/DIGITAL-TRANSFORMATION-FINANCIAL-INCLUSION-KERN-ALEXANDER-XENIA-KARAMETAXAS

Armantier, O., Doerr, S., Frost, J., Fuster, A., & Shue, K. (2021). BIS Bulletin No 42 Whom do consumers trust with their data? US survey evidence. www.bis.org

Ayaz, A., & Yanartaş, M. (2020). An analysis on the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology theory (UTAUT): Acceptance of electronic document management system (EDMS). Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 2, 100032. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CHBR.2020.100032

Chen, S., Doerr, S., Frost, J., Gambacorta, L., & Shin, H. S. (2023). The fintech gender gap. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 54, 101026. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JFI.2023.101026

Dixon, L. J., Correa, T., Straubhaar, J., Covarrubias, L., Graber, D., Spence, J., & Rojas, V. (2014). Gendered Space: The Digital Divide between Male and Female Users in Internet Public Access Sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(4), 991–1009. https://doi.org/10.1111/JCC4.12088

Emanuela, E., Widyanti, A., Pratama, G. B., Abubakar, L., & Handayani, T. (2018). Financial Technology: Legal Challenges for Indonesia Financial Sector. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 175(1), 012204. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/175/1/012204

Hair, J. F., T, H. G., Ringle C. M., &, & M, S. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). 384. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354331182_A_Primer_on_Partial_Least_Squares_Structural_Equation_Modeling_PLS-SEM

Hanafizadeh, P., Keating, B. W., & Khedmatgozar, H. R. (2014). A systematic review of Internet banking adoption. Telematics and Informatics, 31(3), 492–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2013.04.003

Hermansson, C., & Jonsson, S. (2021). The impact of financial literacy and financial interest on risk tolerance. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, 29, 100450. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBEF.2020.100450

Hidajat, T. (2020). Unethical practices peer-to-peer lending in Indonesia. Journal of Financial Crime, 27(1), 274–282. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-02-2019-0028/FULL/XML

Kim, J., Kim, S. (Sam), Jhang, J., Doust, N. A. S., Chan, R. Y. K., & Badu-Baiden, F. (2023). Preference for utilitarian or hedonic value options during a pandemic crisis: The moderation effects of childhood socioeconomic status and sensation-seeking. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 110, 103427. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IJHM.2023.103427

Kurniadi, E., Gladisca Hendityasari, G., & Minsani Mariani, D. (2021). Analysis Factors Affecting Lenders Intention In P2p Lending Platform Using Utaut2 Model. In Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (Vol. 12, Issue 3).

Kurniawan, R. (2019). Examination of the Factors Contributing to Financial Technology Adoption in Indonesia using Technology Acceptance Model: Case Study of Peer to Peer Lending Service Platform. Proceedings of 2019 International Conference on Information Management and Technology, ICIMTech 2019, 432–437. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTECH.2019.8843803

Larrimore, L., Jiang, L., Larrimore, J., Markowitz, D., & Gorski, S. (2011). Peer to Peer Lending: The Relationship Between Language Features, Trustworthiness, and Persuasion Success. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 39(1), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2010.536844

Lin, Y., & Yu, Z. (2023). Extending Technology Acceptance Model to higher-education students’ use of digital academic reading tools on computers. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/S41239-023-00403-8/TABLES/6

Menon, D., & Shilpa, K. (2023). “Chatting with ChatGPT”: Analyzing the factors influencing users’ intention to Use the Open AI’s ChatGPT using the UTAUT model. Heliyon, 9(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20962

Michels, J. (2012). Do Unverifiable Disclosures Matter? Evidence from Peer-to-Peer Lending. The Accounting Review, 87(4), 1385–1413. https://doi.org/10.2308/ACCR-50159

Mohta, A., & Shunmugasundaram, V. (2023). Millennials’ financial literacy and risk behavior: evidence from India. International Review of Economics, 70(4), 419–435. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-023-00425-8

Novantia Berlianti, S., Amrullah Suwaidi, R., & Java, E. (2023). The Effect of Financial Literacy, Locus of Control and Life Style on the Financial Behavior of Peer to Peer Lending Paylater User In Surabaya City. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 4(11), 4126–4134. https://doi.org/10.11594/IJMABER.04.11.29

OJK, H. 2024. Statistik P2P Lending Periode Febuari. Excel, JAKARTA: OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN.

OJK., H. 2023. "Literasi Keuangan." OJK 1.

Overby, J. W., & Lee, E. J. (2006). The effects of utilitarian and hedonic online shopping value on consumer preference and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 59(10–11), 1160–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2006.03.008

Putri, G. A., Widagdo, A. K., & Setiawan, D. (2023). Analysis of financial technology acceptance of peer to peer lending (P2P lending) using extended technology acceptance model (TAM). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100027

Rosmita Rasyid, M. (2019). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Firm Financial Performance. Jurnal Paradigma Akuntansi, 1(3), 675. https://doi.org/10.24912/JPA.V1I3.5570

Septiani, H. L. D., Sumarwan, U., Yuliati, L. N., & Kirbrandoko, K. (2020). Farmers’ Behavioral Intention to Adopt Peer-To-Peer Lending Using UTAUT2 Approach. Jurnal Manajemen Dan Agribisnis. https://doi.org/10.17358/jma.17.2.107

Setiawan, K. 2018. Literasi dan Inklusi Keuangan Indonesia. Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Setiawan, M., & Setyawati, C. Y. (2020). The Influence of Perceived Ease of Use on the Intention to Use Mobile Payment. Journal of Accounting and Strategic Finance, 3(1), 18–32. https://doi.org/10.33005/JASF.V3I1.67

Sitorus, I. (2021). Determinan Perilaku Kaum Milenial Dalam Berinvestasi Peer To Peer Lending.

Statistik P2P Lending Periode Februari 2024. (n.d.). Retrieved April 29, 2024, from https://ojk.go.id/id/kanal/iknb/data-dan-statistik/fintech/Pages/Statistik-P2P-Lending-Periode-Februari-2024.aspx

Stewart, H., & Jürjens, J. (2018). Data security and consumer trust in FinTech innovation in Germany. Information and Computer Security, 26(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICS-06-2017-0039/FULL/PDF

Sunardi, R., Hamidah, H., Dharmawan Buchdadi, A., Buchdadi, A. D., & Purwana, D. (n.d.). Factors Determining Adoption of Fintech Peer-to-Peer Lending Platform: An Empirical Study in Indonesia*. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2022.vol9.no1.0043

Sunardi, R., Suhud, U., Purwana, D., & Hamidah, H. (2021). Examining the Factors Contributing to Fintech Peer-to-peer Lending Adoption. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Business Intelligence, 7(2), 91. https://doi.org/10.20473/jisebi.7.2.91-101

Sungkana, B. E. K., Sutarso, Y., & Prawitowati, T. (2019). Benefits and Risk Perception of User Financial Technology sat- isfaction and Trust in lndonesia: Literature Review and Proposed Model Literature Review and Proposed Model.

Susanti, R., Dalimunthe, Z., & Triono, R. A. (2020). What Factors Affect the Intention to Borrow Through Peer to Peer Lending in Indonesia? https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3787336

Tampubolon, H. R. (2019). http://jurnal.fh.unpad.ac.id/index.php/JBMH/article/view/jbmh%2Cv3n2%2Ca15. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 3(2), 188–198. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v3n2.15

U, G.-O., D, D., Yo, C., & B, O. (2022). Factors Affecting Borrowers’ Intention in Peer-To-Peer Lending Platform in Mongolia. Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies, 2(7), 1.306-1.311. https://doi.org/10.59188/EDUVEST.V2I7.516

Usman, T. A. (2022). Analisa model utaut (unified theory of acceptance and use of technology) dalam peningkatan penggunaan layanan transaksi digital Bank Mandiri pada masa pandemi covid-19. Fair Value: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 4(9), 4186–4192. https://doi.org/10.32670/FAIRVALUE.V4I9.1617

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Yakoboski, P. J., Lusardi, A., & Hasler, A. (2022). How Financial Literacy Varies Among U.S. Adults: The 2022 TIAA Institute-GFLEC Personal Finance Index. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.4256989

Yohanes, K., Junius, K., Saputra, Y., Sari, R., Lisanti, Y., & Luhukay, D. (2020). Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model perspective to enhance user acceptance of fintech application. Proceedings of 2020 International Conference on Information Management and Technology, ICIMTech 2020, 643–648. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIMTECH50083.2020.9211250

Zhang, L., Tan, W., Xu, Y., & Tan, G. (2011). Dimensions of perceived risk and their influence on consumers’ purchasing behavior in the overall process of B2C. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, 111 LNEE, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-24823-8_1

Published
2024-07-19
How to Cite
Panjaitan, F., Setowati, S. M., & Mahulete, Y. C. (2024). PEER TO PEER LENDING : GENERATION Z ATTRACTION FACTORS AND FUTURE IMPLICATIONS. TRANSEKONOMIKA: AKUNTANSI, BISNIS DAN KEUANGAN, 4(4), 422-437. https://doi.org/10.55047/transekonomika.v4i4.678
Section
Articles