Dampak Perpajakan Akibat Perubahan Batubara Menjadi Barang Kena Pajak Berdasarkan Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2020 bagi Pengusaha Batubara (Studi Kasus PT XYZ)

Muhammad Abyan Al Haqi; Yuniarwati Yuniarwati

doi:10.55047/transekonomika.v5i1.843

Muhammad Abyan Al Haqi* Program Pendidikan Profesi Akuntan, Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia
Yuniarwati Program Pendidikan Profesi Akuntan, Fakultas Ekonomi Dan Bisnis, Universitas Tarumanagara, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.55047/transekonomika.v5i1.843

Keywords: Taxation, Taxable Goods, Revenue Recognition

Abstract

The impact of changing the status of coal to Taxable Goods (BKP) based on Law No. 11 of 2020 and its implications for taxation for companies, with a case study of PT XYZ. The main problem faced is tax disputes due to differences in interpretation regarding the time of delivery of goods that affect the imposition of Value Added Tax (VAT). This study aims to evaluate the problem based on applicable accounting standards and tax regulations and provide recommendations to prevent similar disputes in the future. The research method used is descriptive qualitative with data collection techniques in the form of interviews, participatory observation, and analysis of related documents such as financial statements, tax invoices, and shipping documents. The results show that tax disputes arise due to discrepancies in revenue recognition and transaction recording between companies and tax authorities. PT XYZ should have recognized revenue at the time the Berita Acara Serah Terima (BAST) (also refer to Handover Report or Minutes of Handover) document was issued, which marked the transfer of rights and risks of the goods. In addition, the Input Tax credited before the company was confirmed as a Taxable Entrepreneur (PKP) was not in accordance with tax regulations. The implications of this study highlight the importance of adequate accounting documentation and revenue recognition as per accounting standards to ensure compliance with tax regulations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amirah, S. A., & Trisnaningsih, S. (2022). Analisis Perbandingan antara Pengenaan Pajak Penjualan dan PPN akibat Perubahan PKP2B menjadi IUPK dan Adanya UU Cipta Kerja. Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi, 22(2), 1176–1182.

Hartono, D., Indriyani, W., Iryani, B. S., Komarulzaman, A., Nugroho, A., & Kurniawan, R. (2023). Carbon tax, energy policy, and sustainable development in Indonesia. Sustainable Development, 31(4). https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2511

Haryati, D., Azmi, Z., Junaid, A., Putri, R. D., Purba, R., Qosim, N., Hasibuan, R., Ernayani, R., & Nurdin, M. (2022). Teori Akuntansi (DP Sari. PT Global Eksekutif Teknologi.

Khasanah, U., Wicaksono, G., Alamanda, A. R., Darmawati, L. E. S., Patimah, S., Suyati, S., Handayani, P., Handayani, F., & Lestari, B. A. H. (2022). Akuntansi Pajak. Get Press.

Pangala, K. G., Alexander, S. W., & Tirayoh, V. Z. (2023). Analisis Penerapan Psak No. 72 Pada Pt Yonda Sejahtera Manado: Analysis Of The Application Of PSAK No. 72 At PT Yonda Sejahtera Manado. Jurnal LPPM Bidang EkoSosBudKum (Ekonomi, Sosial, Budaya, Dan Hukum), 7(4), 345–354.

Prasetyowati, H., & Panjawa, J. L. (2022). Teknologi Dan Distribusi Pajak Mendukung Kualitas Pembangunan Manusia. Transekonomika: Akuntansi, Bisnis Dan Keuangan, 2(2), 23–36.

Pratiwi, Y. T., Andayani, A., & Soeparno, K. (2022). Analisis Penerapan Pajak Pertambahan Nilai (Ppn) Atas Transaksi Penjualan Barang Kena Pajak Pada Pt. Novapharin. INCOME, 3(2), 58–71.

Putri, N. A., & Muhasan, I. (2021). PPN Atas Penyerahan Batu Bara Dalam Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja (Menakar Potensi Kenaikan atau Penurunannya terhadap Penerimaan Negara). Jurnal Pajak Indonesia (Indonesian Tax Review), 5(2), 108–113.

Qivi Hady Daholi, T., & Dewantara, A. R. (2023). Indonesian “sixth method” on intercompany sales in coal mining industries. International Transfer Pricing Journal, 2023(6). https://doi.org/10.59403/2p1zf

Safinatunnayah, Z. A. (2023). Pengaruh Pemeriksaan Pajak, Penagihan Pajak Dan Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak Terhadap Efektifitas Penerimaan Pajak Pada Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Depok Cimanggis. Jurnal Bina Akuntansi, 10(2), 651–675.

Sanasintani, S. P. (2020). Implementation Academic Supervisions By The Education Supervissors In Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Negeri (Min) Pahandut Palangka Raya. Penamas, 33(2), 293–306.

Sinaga, S. T., Ekananda, M., Gitaharie, B. Y., & Setyowati, M. (2023). Tax Buoyancy in Indonesia: An Evaluation of Tax Structure and Policy Reforms. Economies, 11(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies11120294

Siregar, S. V. N. P. (2019). Akuntansi Keuangan berdasarkan SAK Berbasis IFRS (Buku 2).

Temalagi, S., Dwianika, A., Oktris, L., & Anasta, L. (2023). Akuntansi Pajak: Teori, Praktik, dan Implementasi. Penerbit Salemba.

Tjondro, E., & Tjaraka, H. (2023). How does market-based governance influence sustainable tax behaviour? Evidence from tax haven utilisation and tax avoidance. International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSE.2024.135200

Wahyuning, S. (2023). Akuntansi Pajak. Penerbit Yayasan Prima Agus Teknik, 1–105.

Yahya, M. (2020). Logika Dasar Akuntansi. Mirra Buana Media.