IDENTIFIKASI TANTANGAN PADA PEMBELAJARAN DI SDN MITRA BAGI MAHASISWA PESERTA PROGRAM KAMPUS MENGAJAR CALON GURU IPA FKIP ULM

  • Yessi Anissa Pratiwi* Program Studi Pendidikan IPA, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
  • Sauqina Program Studi Pendidikan IPA, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
  • Mella Mutika Sari Program Studi Pendidikan IPA, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat
Keywords: Learning, Use of Technology, Teacher Candidates

Abstract

Learning activities have changed in Indonesia as a result of the COVID-19 epidemic. One of them is the SDN Mitra education program. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine the difficulties in implementing the teaching campus program at SDN Mitra for prospective science educators at FKIP ULM. School administrators, teachers, education personnel, students, and the community at SDN Mitra were the research subjects. An autoethnographic qualitative research approach was used in this study. using unstructured interviews, observation, and documentation as data collection methods. This writing shows that (1) in learning class III, students have skills in teaching, including teaching styles in the classroom, the use of tools when teaching, interaction patterns in teaching, students' ability to arouse curiosity, students' ability to achieve learning objectives, giving questions or oral, giving praise for the results achieved by students. (2) There are 4 grade III students who have difficulties such as reading, writing, and calculating difficulties, (3) In the use of technology at SDN Mitra, there are 2 educators who are not good at using technology. This is due to the age factor so that the ability to use technology is reduced.

References

Anwar, R. N. (2021). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Daring Pendidikan Agama Islam di Perguruan Tinggi Umum. Proceeding Umsurabaya, 1(1).

Arifin, I. (1996). Penelitian Kualitatif dalam ilmu-ilmu Sosial dan Keagamaan. Malang: Kalimasahada Press.

Arifin, Z. (2009). Evaluasi pembelajaran (Vol. 8). Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Azwar, S. (1994). Seleksi aitem dalam penyusunan skala psikologi. Buletin Psikologi, 2(2), 26–33.

Bodgan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative Research For Education: An Introduction to Theory and Method. Boston: Ally &Bacon. Inc.

Chang, H. (2008). Authoetnograpy as Method. California: Left Coast Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2015). Penelitian kualitatif & desain riset. Yogyakarta: pustaka pelajar.

Esterberg, K. G. (2002). Qualitative methods in social research (Nomor 300.18 E8).

Gilbert, M., Dewatripont, M., Muraille, E., Platteau, J.-P., & Goldman, M. (2020). Preparing for a responsible lockdown exit strategy. Nature medicine, 26(5), 643–644.

Istihana, I. (2015). Pengelolaan Kelas Di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah. Terampil: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Dasar, 2(2), 267–284.

Kahn, R. L., & Cannell, C. F. (1957). The dynamics of interviewing; theory, technique, and cases.

Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2005). Practical research: planning and design. International edition. Upper Saddle, NJ: Pearson Educational International.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Egon, G. G. (1965). uba, Naturalistic Inquiry: Reability and Validity in Qualitative Research. London: Sage Publication.

Majid, A. (2005). Perencanaan Pembelajaran, Mengembangkan Standar Kompetensi Guru. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Moleong, L. J. (2018). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Edisi Revisi. Cetakan ketiga puluh delapan. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

PISA, O. (2019). Results (volume I): what students know and can do. Paris: PISA. OECD Publishing.

Prayogo, Y. (2020). Peluang Reformasi Pendidikan di Tengah Pandemi Covid-19, Begini Kata Mendikbud. Kaldera News.

Riyanda, A. R., Herlina, K., & Wicaksono, B. A. (2020). Evaluasi implementasi sistem pembelajaran daring fakultas keguruan dan ilmu pendidikan universitas Lampung. IKRA-ITH HUMANIORA: Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 4(1), 66–71.

Saefulmilah, R. M. I., & Saway, M. H. M. (2020). Hambatan-hambatan pada pelaksanaan pembelajaran daring di SMA Riyadhul Jannah Jalancagak Subang. Nusantara, 2(3), 393–404.

Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. The coding manual for qualitative researchers, 1–440.

Sanjaya, H. W. (2016). Media komunikasi pembelajaran. Prenada Media.

Sari, E. S., & Pujiono, S. (2017). Budaya Literasi di Kalangan Mahasiswa FBS UNY. Litera, 16(1).

Sarosa, S. (2021). Analisis Data Penelitian Kualitatif. Pt Kanisius.

Savitri, D. I. (2020). Peran Guru Sd Di Kawasan Perbatasan Pada Era Pembelajaran 5.0 Dan Merdeka Belajar. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dasar, 2.

Sherly, D. E., & Sihombing, H. B. (2020). Merdeka Belajar: Kajian Literatur. Di dalam: Al-Banjari MA, editor. Merdeka Belajar di Era Pendidikan 4.0. Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Pendidikan, 183–190.

Slameto, B., & yang Mempengaruhinya, F.-F. (2003). Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. Cet. III.

Soemanto, W. (2006). Psikologi Pendidikan, cetakan kelima. Rineka Cipta: Jakarta.

Sugiyono. (2017). Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Surya, M. (2013). Psikologi guru konsep dan aplikasi. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Usman, M. U. (2006). Menjadi guru profesional.

Zarocostas, J. (2020). How to fight an infodemic. The lancet, 395(10225), 676.

Published
2023-07-15
How to Cite
Pratiwi, Y. A., Sauqina, & Sari, M. M. (2023). IDENTIFIKASI TANTANGAN PADA PEMBELAJARAN DI SDN MITRA BAGI MAHASISWA PESERTA PROGRAM KAMPUS MENGAJAR CALON GURU IPA FKIP ULM. JURNAL RISET PENDIDIKAN DAN PENGAJARAN, 2(1), 72-83. https://doi.org/10.55047/jrpp.v2i1.422
Section
Articles